<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Plain Violation of Civilian Control? &#8211; Part Trois</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warhistorian.org/wordpress/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warhistorian.org/wordpress/?p=1789</link>
	<description>Toward a Broader Vision of Military History and National Security Affairs</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 20:34:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charles Bowery</title>
		<link>http://warhistorian.org/wordpress/?p=1789&#038;cpage=1#comment-88486</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles Bowery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warhistorian.org/wordpress/?p=1789#comment-88486</guid>
		<description>Mark, thanks for this series of posts.  They provide further evidence of the value of your blog to our discourse about things military.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, thanks for this series of posts.  They provide further evidence of the value of your blog to our discourse about things military.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ralph Hitchens</title>
		<link>http://warhistorian.org/wordpress/?p=1789&#038;cpage=1#comment-88296</link>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Hitchens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 15:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warhistorian.org/wordpress/?p=1789#comment-88296</guid>
		<description>Nothing like going to the source.  This was indeed a manufactured brouhaha.  Reminds me in some respects of the manufactured brouhaha over the declassified PDB of 6 August 2001, which all too many in the press chose to see as a &quot;smoking gun&quot; when it was nothing of the sort.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing like going to the source.  This was indeed a manufactured brouhaha.  Reminds me in some respects of the manufactured brouhaha over the declassified PDB of 6 August 2001, which all too many in the press chose to see as a &#8220;smoking gun&#8221; when it was nothing of the sort.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
